A Pulse check-in is not a survey in the way most people think of one. It is a structured alignment read — a short, focused set of questions designed to surface whether team members understand and believe in the strategic direction. It takes 3 to 5 minutes to complete. Anonymity is fully structural — individual responses are never visible to any leader.

How it is delivered

Check-ins are sent on a cadence you set — typically monthly or quarterly, depending on how frequently your strategic context changes. They are delivered via email or an embedded link. Team members do not need to log in to a new platform to respond. See the full How It Works overview for the broader picture of how Pulse fits into your planning cycle.

Seeing this in your organization?

30 minutes with the founders. We will talk through how Pulse surfaces alignment signal in your specific organizational context.

What the questions look like

The questions are structured around comprehension and belief, not sentiment. They ask team members to describe their understanding of strategic priorities, indicate their level of belief in the current direction, and flag any areas where they feel unclear or unconvinced. The design avoids the evaluative framing that produces socially desirable responses. See the full explanation of what Pulse measures.

What you see on the dashboard

The dashboard shows alignment signal across your team — how comprehension and belief are distributed, where gaps are concentrated, and how the signal has changed from the previous cycle. You also see participation rates and trend data over time. The data is never visible at the individual level — only aggregated patterns reach leadership views.

What happens after a check-in

The most important part of Pulse is what happens after the data comes in. Teams with high participation stay engaged because leadership responds to the data — closes the gaps, addresses the concerns, and communicates what changed. Plans that stall usually stall because nobody knew the gap existed. Pulse makes the gap visible before it becomes an execution problem.