Starting with one team or department is a legitimate approach and often produces the most useful initial data. A smaller group gives you faster feedback loops and lets you refine the check-in framing before you roll it out to the full organization.

What a team-level pilot looks like

In a pilot, Pulse is configured for a single team, department, or school. The check-ins go to that group only. You get alignment data at that level first, which gives you a contained view of how the tool works and what the data means before the stakes are organization-wide. Most pilots run one or two check-in cycles before the decision to expand is made.

Seeing this in your organization?

30 minutes with the founders. We will talk through how Pulse surfaces alignment signal in your specific organizational context.

What the data from a pilot can tell you

Pilot data is useful for two things: proving the tool's value internally and refining the check-in question framing for your specific organizational context. If the pilot team's alignment data connects to execution patterns you can already observe, you have a strong case for the data's accuracy. If the question framing produces confusing or unexpected results, you have the chance to adjust it before rolling out at scale.

How expansion works

Expanding from a pilot to the full organization is straightforward. The configuration carries over. You add additional recipients to the check-in list and the cadence continues. There is no separate implementation process for expansion.